The World Forum - Political Forums

Nonpartisan political forums. Political blogs. International news.

Discuss and debate political, cultural, social and environmental issues.

submit story | sections | topics | your account | help/FAQ | contact | links | search | RSS
] International %% Africa %% Asia %% Australia/Oceania Europe %% North America %% South America %% Blogs %% Site Talk ]

 North Korea Ready To Resume Nuclear Talks


Politics

By Drog (Canada), Section Korea, North
Posted on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 09:23:31 AM PST

After months of harsh anti-American rhetoric, North Korea surprised everyone by announcing that they are willing to return to six-party nuclear talks and will treat the United States as a friend -- if Washington will stop slandering the rule of totalitarian leader Kim Jong Il. As CBC News reports, the overture came shortly after a U.S. Congressional delegation of six American lawmakers concluded talks with senior officials in Pyongyang, namely North Korea's No. 2 leader, Kim Yong Nam, Foreign Minister Paek Nam Sun and Vice Foreign Minister Kim Kye Gwan, who is also North Korea's chief representative to nuclear negotiations.

The delegation called the meeting an "overwhelming success", saying that North Korea appears ready to negotiate within weeks.

"Our focus was on the process to get the six-party talks moving again, to reassure the leaders of the DRPK (Democratic People's Republic of Korea) that we wish them no ill will, to reinforce the fact of what our president has said, that we do not wish to have a regime change, that we will not pre-emptively attack the North, but we do need to resolve the nuclear issue," said the delegation's leader Republican Rep. Curt Weldon, vice chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

North Korea's official news agency, KCNA, reported their officials as having told the delegation that "the DPRK would opt for finding a final solution to all the outstanding issues between the two countries, to say nothing of the resumption of the six-party talks and the nuclear issue, if what U.S. congressmen said would be formulated as a policy of the second Bush administration."

Washington has reportedly decided to remove one of its harshest critics of Pyongyang's totalitarian regime, Undersecretary of State John Bolton, from the next administration. In July 2003, during the run up to the six-nation talks with North Korea, Bolton described Korean head of state Kim Jong Il as a "tyrannical dictator" of a country where "life is a hellish nightmare." North Korea responded by saying that "such human scum and bloodsucker is not entitled to take part in the talks. ... We have decided not to consider him as an official of the U.S. administration any longer nor to deal with." Bolton's removal was expected to appease Pyongyang.

What's your opinion?
Welcome to our discussion below!
(Free signup required to post comments.)

Advertisement

Coming soon!

The world could use more dialogue about its differences — a little understanding goes a long way. There are many online forums where people with different perspectives yell at each other and hurl abuse. There aren't so many where completely different points of view are expressed rationally and constructively. That's why The World Forum was created.
Display: Sort:
Final talks??? (none / 0) (#1)
by Machi (Canada) on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 12:27:03 PM PST

Good that both sides are back at the table.

Now, if all goes well is North Korea bound to go the way of China?. As long as there is market access for interested parties will human rights violations be conveniently ignored?

Why not follow in step with China's success story?  (success defined purely by perspective of course) Western nations simply overlook human rights issues and as a reward the doors of economic opportunity are widely opened. I assume the price of democracy is economic bargaining power and China has lots of it. Can North Korea do the same?

 

Talks (none / 1) (#2)
by you look like a nail (Canada) on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 03:19:08 PM PST

Does economic power mean free reign to carry out human rights violations?  Looking at the US, I'd say so.

China is an emerging global power, and a rapidly growing market.  That's a major inducement to do business, and to ignore things which might get in the way of that.  Less cynically, engagement is more productive than isolation, in terms of cultivating progressive attitudes.

With North Korea, market power isn't what is keeping the US talking.  What NK has to bargain with is the possibility of destabilizing a region the US wants to keep stable, and posing a threat to countries that the US has assumed a responsibility to defend -- South Korea mainly, but also Japan.

In the short term, talking with NK keeps them from causing trouble in the region.  In the long term, it offers the possiblity that NK will gradually become more open and more economically healthy, which will probably also make it less likely to pose a human rights problem.  It's a much better strategy than criticizing them for their problems and shutting them out of the international community, which might make us feel better about ourselves in the short term, but will continue to do absolutely nothing in terms of effecting change in North Korea.

-- Your Reality Check is in the mail.
[ Parent ]

In agreement there (none / 0) (#3)
by Machi (Canada) on Mon Jan 17, 2005 at 06:39:22 AM PST

Good point!
Although criticizing while at the same time negotiatiating is not a negative. I think if we only emphasize the positives of a country's policies and ignore the negatives then we are doing a disservice to the people that have to live under such oppressive conditions.

[ Parent ]


Login

Username:
Password:

Signup to post comments, to vote on story submissions and to set preferences.

create account | faq | search