Nonpartisan political forums. Political blogs. International news.

        "... I have Always defended that KV63 is a secondary burial, or reburial of several individuals (probably of the same family) whose original graves were destroyed, well for thieves of graves or for religious fanatics, bearing in mind the dates in which we are, an epoch that there includes from the times of hated Ajsch-en-Iten (Akhenatón) until the epoch of the king child Tut-Anjsch-Imen (Tutankhamón) ... " - Díaz-Montexano points.

The latter find, truly it has turned out disappointing for the majority of the eyptologists (professionals and amateurs) that they were trusting in the possibility of finding a human finished body, or a complete mummy, although it was in the latter coffin; nevertheless, in the context of the hypotheses of the hispanocuban scriptolist, it alters by no means not even an apex to what already it had been corroborated little by little from a beginning.

The fact that it could have existed although it is a mummy in one of the coffins an authentic gift had proved - without doubts - for all, but, for the theory that defends - from the origins themselves of the finds, in February of the present year - it is absolutely irrelevant the one that existed or not mummies, as for which the grave in question might be a reburial or secondary burial, or a "cachette" of coffins and symbolic objects associate (as the "pseudocanopos", vases making a detour to the coffins or sarcofagi, and that exactly are four for every coffin, according to the custom), that was created by the little that certain priests could recover from a few graves orginales destroyed previously and who would be in another place of the same Vale of the Kings, and probably also in the Vale of the Queens.

        "... There would not surprise by no means that his any of the bodies (or part of them) that were any time in these coffins might appear in any moment in another hidden place, if it is that they have not already appeared a lot of time ago in some of the well-known hidden places ... " - Díaz-Montexano comments.

Amateur concludes the egitólogo:

        "... In any case, and risking a little (since we are before only one photo that also does not present the ideal resolution) it seems to me to make out in the disposition of the jewelry an apparent intentional arranging that remembers the disposition that does of the same ones on a body, with what we might be before a new evidence of the symbolic use, in this case, a symbolic mummy or " pseudomummy ". It does not escape from me either what they look like the bones of the radio and the ulna of an arm human right, a fragment of rib of the right side street, and other possible bones of both hands, distributed in a quite anatomical dispoción ... ".

In end, since it usually said it will be necessary to wait for later results of one deeper analysis; although according to Díaz-Montexano: " ... it is quite probable that there are human remains in this coffin ... ".